low RNA concentration and low 260/230 ratio

Use this category for the exchange of ideas, methodologies and references regarding the isolation, manipulation and analysis of RNA. (Extraction protocols, Northern Blot analysis, RNase Protection, Differential Display, In Vitro Transcription, etc.)

Moderators: mchlbrmn, Abhijeet Bakre

low RNA concentration and low 260/230 ratio

Postby Piyawan » Aug 13 2012 5:27 pm

Hi , Could someone give me some suggestion?
I purified RNA from lymphocyte (4x10^5 cells) I got 260/280 ratio around 1.8-2.0 and I got 260/230 ratio around 0.6-1.0 and RNA concentration 10-20 ng/ul by Nanodrop. I used RNeasy plus micro kit. I tried to wash twice with PRE buffer but the ratio 260/230 is still low as this ration is indicate that there is salt carryover. I tried many times but this ratio still low. However, with the high number of cells I got better value of 260/230 around 1.5. Does anyone know this ratio(260/230) is still low because of low concentration of RNA or not?
Thank you very much indeed
Piyawan
Piyawan
newcomer
newcomer
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Aug 13 2012 5:11 pm

Re: low RNA concentration and low 260/230 ratio

Postby relaxin » Aug 14 2012 8:47 am

I normally do not bother to look at the A260/A230 ratio. As long as the RT-PCR works, do not worry too much.
If the RNA concentration is too low, you can concentrate it by ethanol precipitation and redissolving in smaller volume of water.
Not affiliated with any company. Mention of a specifc product does not imply my endorsement of the product. No conflict of interest or guarantee to work on the advice given. Do as I say, not as I do. Not liable to the loss of your valuable samples.
relaxin
PI of Posters
PI of Posters
 
Posts: 6468
Joined: Jan 11 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Mauna Kea

Re: low RNA concentration and low 260/230 ratio

Postby memari » Nov 07 2012 3:10 pm

COPY, PASTE from Qiagen:
Effects of low A260/A230 ratios in RNA preparations on downstream applications:

The efficiency of downstream applications depends strongly on the purity of the RNA sample used. Pure RNA should yield an A260/A230 ratio of around 2 or slightly above; however, there is no consensus on the acceptable lower limit of this ratio. Possible candidates that can increase the A230 include “salt”, carbohydrates, peptides, and phenol (or aromatic compounds in general). In our experience, the increased absorbance at 230 nm in RNA samples is almost always due to contamination with guanidine thiocyanate, present at very high concentrations in the lysis buffer or extraction reagent used in most RNA purification procedures.

Please find an article discussing the effect of low 260/230 ratios in RNA preparations on downstream applications on page 7 of QIAGEN Newsletter 15, March 2010. In summary, we found that concentrations of guanidine thiocyanate of up to 100 mM in an RNA sample do not compromise the reliability of downstream applications.

http://www.qiagen.com/faq/faqview.aspx? ... Id=1000283
memari
supertech
supertech
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Sep 16 2004 1:35 am


Return to RNA Methods

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests