sds page result

Non-professional visitors (i.e., lay people, high school and undergraduate students) or professionals from other fields should use this forum for general questions regarding molecular biology. No guarantee that they'll be answered but you can always try!

Moderators: r.rosati, mchlbrmn

sds page result

Postby Gayathri Selvaraju » May 18 2012 7:42 am

I'm a student and currently doing my final year project on "Partial purification and characterization of thermostable alkaline protease". I did sds page but I only managed to get the standard protein marker band. But, not my sample's band. May i know what's the reason for this situation. And protein content of my sample is very low. So may i knw what is the reason for this. Moreover, if i included this in my result, how am I suppose to discuss my result?

Thank you
Gayathri Selvaraju
technician-in-training
technician-in-training
 
Posts: 7
Joined: May 18 2012 7:36 am

Re: sds page result

Postby mdfenko » May 18 2012 9:05 am

how did you visualize? coomassie?

since you have very little sample you should use a very sensitive detection method (eg silver stain).

how did you prepare your sample?

what is the size of your protein?

what percentage gel?

we need more information to make recommendations.
talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do
mdfenko
ModSquad
ModSquad
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Jan 24 2006 2:39 pm
Location: Staten Island, NY USA

Re: sds page result

Postby Gayathri Selvaraju » May 18 2012 9:46 am

I stained by using coomasie .
k just now when I repeated the experiment, i managed to get my sample bands. but it is too light and even couldn't detect the bands.
the gel i used was 12.5%.
the molecular weight of my protein is around 35kDa.
SDS PAGE is recommended by here. so that's why i did not use silver staining.
i prepared my sample with 2X sample buffer.
earlier i extracted my crude protein through centrifugation.
I used heat treatment to for partial purification of my sample. The protein content is too low in the range of 0.0001 like that.
Gayathri Selvaraju
technician-in-training
technician-in-training
 
Posts: 7
Joined: May 18 2012 7:36 am

Re: sds page result

Postby mdfenko » May 18 2012 1:26 pm

you can stain sds-page with silver. it is a lot more sensitive than coomassie.

with a low concentration protein, you use a larger volume and the salts of the sample's buffer can cause distortion. you also may have insufficient stacking. this will allow the band to broaden beyond an easily detectable concentration.
talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do
mdfenko
ModSquad
ModSquad
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Jan 24 2006 2:39 pm
Location: Staten Island, NY USA

Re: sds page result

Postby relaxin » May 18 2012 2:19 pm

If you are not limited by the amount of starting material, you can concentrate your protein by acetone precipitation. Just add 5 volumes of cold (-20 C) acetone to 1 volume of your sample, mix well, and centrifuge down the precipitate, air dry pellet and redissolve in small amount of sample buffer.
Not affiliated with any company. Mention of a specifc product does not imply my endorsement of the product. No conflict of interest or guarantee to work on the advice given. Do as I say, not as I do. Not liable to the loss of your valuable samples.
relaxin
PI of Posters
PI of Posters
 
Posts: 6468
Joined: Jan 11 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Mauna Kea

Re: sds page result

Postby Gayathri Selvaraju » May 18 2012 8:42 pm

Hi,
I used 2X sample buffer which contains 20% glycerol. Suppose I should use 5% glycerol. Besides that, I run the sds page at 20mA. But, the current dropped to 9mA half away. Even, the running buffere were full. But, still I managed to get bands for my protein marker, not for my samples.
Gayathri Selvaraju
technician-in-training
technician-in-training
 
Posts: 7
Joined: May 18 2012 7:36 am

Re: sds page result

Postby relaxin » May 20 2012 8:24 pm

If you mix equal volume of sample and 2X sample buffer, you will get a final concentration of 10% glycerol. This should not pose a problem, since the main function of glycerol is to make the sample dense. You do not get band(s) with sample, because the protein concentration is too low.
Not affiliated with any company. Mention of a specifc product does not imply my endorsement of the product. No conflict of interest or guarantee to work on the advice given. Do as I say, not as I do. Not liable to the loss of your valuable samples.
relaxin
PI of Posters
PI of Posters
 
Posts: 6468
Joined: Jan 11 2006 12:40 pm
Location: Mauna Kea

Re: sds page result

Postby Gayathri Selvaraju » May 20 2012 10:33 pm

Thank You for the replies...
Gayathri Selvaraju
technician-in-training
technician-in-training
 
Posts: 7
Joined: May 18 2012 7:36 am

Re: sds page result

Postby Gayathri Selvaraju » May 23 2012 4:50 am

I tried protein precipitation by using acetone, but my protein become too hard and difficult to resoluble in buffer...may i know the reason?
Gayathri Selvaraju
technician-in-training
technician-in-training
 
Posts: 7
Joined: May 18 2012 7:36 am

Re: sds page result

Postby mdfenko » May 23 2012 7:50 am

a tight pellet will take more work to resolubilize.

you can use a pestle to homogenize.

if using sds-page sample buffer to dissolve the pellet, as recommended by relaxin, then you can heat the sample.
talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do
mdfenko
ModSquad
ModSquad
 
Posts: 1103
Joined: Jan 24 2006 2:39 pm
Location: Staten Island, NY USA


Return to Student Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests